ive been looking about and noticed some companies have been using dual opteron servers and amd athlons to host there game servers and im looking to make a couple of servers but i just wondering what you guys think would be best value money wise as i noticed amd opterons cost alot compared to athlons and p4's.
At the moment i use p4 3.0ghz with 1gb ram but they are mainly sold of as whole dedi's at the moment :P but they arnt good enough if i need to compete with the game server market properly
cheers,
Danny
__________________
(url-removed: need 20 posts)
Powerful Dedicated, Gaming and Voice Servers at great prices. Danny@Eclipse-Servers.com
Location: Formally the dc floor, now an office near you
Age: 27
Posts: 3,098
THIS USER HAS BEEN GAGGED BY THE FORUM HOSTS FOR SPAM OR BREAKING THE RULES...
User will be ungaged in around 78 hours from this post.
Hi Danny,
My personal opinion is that pentiums are poo for gaming
Opterons are indeed very expensive, and powerful, but imo not something you get your money out of for running gaming processes.
Personally, I don't think you can go wrong with either an AMD 3400 64bit or an AMD 3700 64bit.
__________________
Oliver Warburton
Managing Director, INX-Network Ltd.
The UK's leading GSP :)
Company # 05100055. VAT # 875 6215 00. INX-Gaming - (url-removed: need 20 posts). Europe's fastest growing CSS, CZERO, CS gaming league These are not the views of a company director. These are strictly my personal views.
nice i currently have one which is one of the first boxes i got dual xeon 3.2ghz, with 2048mb ram was handy when i started up dave at ukservers made it for me and done a good rent to own deal on it
__________________
(url-removed: need 20 posts)
Powerful Dedicated, Gaming and Voice Servers at great prices. Danny@Eclipse-Servers.com
To compare Athlon64 and Opteron... Athlon is really a desktop processor and generally has 512k of chip cache, Opteron is really a server processor and generally has 1meg of chip cache.. so generally better performance.
__________________
Paul Civati Rack Sense Ltd
Views expressed are my own and not those of the company.
Company reg no. 05115163, VAT reg no. GB 912 5238 45
opterons i noticed multiplayuk use them to host there battlefield 2 ranked servers i think on opteron 246's or something but surely opterons arnt as good if they dont have a decent connection to match seeing the amount of servers you could get on them?
__________________
(url-removed: need 20 posts)
Powerful Dedicated, Gaming and Voice Servers at great prices. Danny@Eclipse-Servers.com
In most instances, you cant fit 'that' many game servers on even dual xeon / opteron boxes anymore purely because CPU usage of game servers being so high!
Im looking at getting a Dual x Dual Core Opteron w/4Gb DDR to run some personal g/servers on in the NL. Seams to have plenty of kick, but ill let you know in a few weeks.
__________________ Neil R Bowen
OH Telecom www.ohtele.com - Special offer on IP Transit across london! Contact us now! info@ohtele.com
ISO 9001 Quality Assured. OH Telecom breaks 30 Gbits!!! usage! All posts are of my own personal view and not neccesarily those of any company, this is a personal forum account
and all comments are assumptions and may not be fact.
150/250 if you are comparing clock speed - but I don't know if clock speed comparison between those architectures is a valid comparison.
Anyhow the 3800+ only has 512KB of L2 cache compared to 1MB on the Opteron - and on some processors the cache can make much more difference than clock speed.
__________________
Paul Civati Rack Sense Ltd
Views expressed are my own and not those of the company.
Company reg no. 05115163, VAT reg no. GB 912 5238 45
BF2 really does benefit from 64-bit processing. In tests a dual opteron 248 provides double the player slots of a dual 2.8 GHz Xeon. Dual 252 and Dual 275 is the way forward for games; we haven't bought a xeon in some time now
Last edited by Wizzo; 20th September 2005 at 04:17 PM.