Hey Guys,
Anyone installed this yet? I have and it seems okay so far. Seems sleek and works okay so far.![]()
Hey Guys,
Anyone installed this yet? I have and it seems okay so far. Seems sleek and works okay so far.![]()
man - I've had this for 2 months now, old news ......
hehe - yeah looks good, very quick and snappy, great screen area. FF3 has given me many headaches with websites not loading / timeouts etc.Am using this as default to see how we go - it is *beta* so I expect problems on the way.
It breaks the font on the bbc website for Low graphics Accessibility Help Access keys help
It seems ok fast enough same as IE7 64bit for me.
They have removed the clutter at the top compared with IE and FF but apart from that I don't see much difference
All though its supposed to be good for JS / AJAX related sites
Chris Daley
Dwebs Ltd :: Company No. 05603664 :: 08000 141 942
2008hosting.net - Windows 2008 Server Hosting Solutions
Dhosting.co.uk - Web Hosting, Managed Servers
Dwebs.ltd.uk - Web Design & Other Services
My views are my own and not those of my company.
They nicked the idea of thumbnails of most popular sites displayed when you open a new tab from an FF extension that I used a while back. Was a great idea.
Ricky
Business Development Manager - Serverstream Ltd
Managed Services | Dedicated Servers | Network Security
T: +44 (0)20 7517 0609 E: ricky@serverstream.net
Note: All of the views above are my own and not in any way representative of my company.
Oh, the 'simpler downloads' feature is another FF add-in.
Interesting move from google if they have secured these plugins from FF's battleground.
Ricky
Business Development Manager - Serverstream Ltd
Managed Services | Dedicated Servers | Network Security
T: +44 (0)20 7517 0609 E: ricky@serverstream.net
Note: All of the views above are my own and not in any way representative of my company.
The only things that this brings to the table are the new javascript engine and running each tab in a separate sandboxed process - both of which should have been done a long time ago.
But there are still major problems left unaddressed - like plugins being able to punch through the sandbox.
I'm hoping these two will be adopted and improved upon by other browsers. Other than that, don't see it making a huge impact right now.
I quite like being able to change the size of text boxes on the fly
••• Mark Castle ••• Secura Hosting Ltd •••
••• Managed Hosting •••
••• AS29452 • UK Company Reg No: 04330657 • VAT Number: 789 2703 81 • Sales: 0845 123 2632 •••
My views are my own and not those of my company.
Call me old-fashioned, I've stuck with IE7![]()
It seems much quicker than both IE and Firefox for me, no major problems yet.
I imagine the uptake will be quite high now, and hence Richards original post, as I noticed it advertised on the main page of google.
Paul Carter
Technical Manager, eHosting Limited
No Linux version yet, so no opportunity to try it myself, but I see there's already a PoC DoS that crashes the whole browser - something the architecture is specifically designed to avoid.
Google Chrome Browser 0.2.149.27 malicious link DoS Vulnerability
That's been a feature of a Safari for a little while now - http://img.skitch.com/20080903-1uukn...kx5it494t9.jpg
Might give Chrome a go today - sadly, needs Windows at the moment.
Adam Cooke
aTech Media - UK Ruby on Rails development specialists
Codebase - a full source control hosting solution for Git, Mercurial & Subversion
NEW Point - really easy and attractive DNS hosting
Company Registration Number: 5523199 VAT Registration Number: GB 868 861 560
All views expressed in my posts are my own and not those of aTech Media Limited.
Some entertaining reading, but going by most of the legal "stand ups" in court with M$ and the like, don't think it's got a leg to stand on!
TapTheHive - This Post Not Made In Chrome; Google's EULA Sucks
Much much better when it comes to Ajax than any of the current crop of browsers - our traffic system uses Ajax extensively for a lot of data display and Chrome is noticeably faster. Biggest advantage over FF is that it doesn't hog anywhere near as much memory.
The EULA is a bit interesting though, although probably easy to get around, "Sorry, the IP rights belong to my employer as I was posting in their time, and they don't grant me the right to assign those rights".
Karl Austin :: Owner :: KDA Web Services Ltd. :: UK Web Hosting and Servers
0800 542 9764 :: Company: 04114724 :: VAT: GB 842 9597 81
"Individual Solutions for Individual Customers" - Call us today for free
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. - Einstein
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)