Web Host Chat
Bringing Hosts & Customers together since 2001
Home QLinks Members Your Profile Register FAQ's Hosts Only Area SMS Alerts Advertising
User Information
»REGISTER NOW!

Go Back   Web Host Chat > Web Hosting Chat > Hosting Software and additional add-on products
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 21st December 2006   #1 (permalink)
Trusted User (495)
Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 486
LeaUK is on a distinguished road
Win Server Web Edition

A quick question, anyone using the web edition? My server is a dual core so the SMP limit is fine, but on MS site http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...efeatures.mspx ASP .NET 2 isn't supported! Surely that cant be right.

On MS's TechNet site they say it is! Confused...any thoughts?

Also any thoughts in general about using the web edition?

Much appreciated
Lea
__________________
Registered User
LeaUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2006   #2 (permalink)
I am Staff at
Serverstream Ltd
About My Company!


Certified Host
JamieBeeston's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,394
JamieBeeston is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeaUK2 View Post
Also any thoughts in general about using the web edition?
Just don't, use the Server edition, it's only a few quid a month more and it doesn't have any of the pesky limits / restrictions.

J
__________________
Register1.net
.eu £7.95
.com .net .org .uk £5.48
Premium Virtual Hosting from £33 a year
Quad Core 2.5Ghz 1GB 250GB Xeon Servers from £49
Company reg: 04186664 VAT reg: GB 815 5899 88
[Any views expressed on this forum are my own, and may not represent the views of any organisation that I own or am connected with.]
__________________
Web Host - VIP Member
JamieBeeston is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006   #3 (permalink)
I am Staff at
LCHost
About My Company!

Certified Host
philb's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 1,323
philb is on a distinguished road
My last SPLA price list didnt even have 'web edition' on anymore. I just have Server "unauthenticated" (eg: no windows user account based authentication permitted)
__________________
Phillip Baker
LCHost Chief Technical Officer
Hello, Companies Act 2006. Because looking information up at Companies House is very very difficult indeed (especially as they think the Internet closes at night), and this post could possibly be construed as a business communication, I am legally required to furnish you with the following information: Low Cost Host Ltd - Reg# 5172812, VAT# GB 842 9750 02 Correspondence address PO Box 11, Brighouse, W Yorks, HD6 1LQ Registered address c/o Allan P Naylor Accountant, 8 King Cross St, Halifax, W Yorks, HX1 2SH Inside leg measurement 31in (or 78.74cm) Favourite colour Blue Attitude towards ridiculous legislation Incredulous
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
philb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006   #4 (permalink)
Trusted User (495)
Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 486
LeaUK is on a distinguished road
Hi Guys

Appreciated. And I think more importantly I now realise I need SPLA, period! Off to check pricing...

Cheers
Lea

BTW - If I run Plesk which creates windows User Accounts, can I still run Un-authenticated, also I need RDC for one user, now I guess Un-authenticated is unsuitable....oooooh, so many questions sorry..
__________________
Registered User

Last edited by LeaUK : 22nd December 2006 at 05:26 AM.
LeaUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006   #5 (permalink)
Trusted User (495)
Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 486
LeaUK is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Q. Are there any types of applications running on Windows Server 2003 that will prevent the use of Anonymous “Un-authenticated” Processor License?

A. Windows Servers used as platform for applications that have direct or indirect interaction with Windows authentication services are excluded from the use of the Windows Anonymous Processor License. When Windows Server 2003 is used as the platform for Microsoft server products like Exchange 2000, SharePoint Portal Server, and Microsoft Provisioning System, Windows Server 2003 cannot be licensed with the Anonymous Processor License.
I think this sums it up!
__________________
Registered User
LeaUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2006   #6 (permalink)
Registered User (27)
Going on up...
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 27
dotNetFreak is on a distinguished road
You can use unauthenticated processor licensing if the accounts Plesk creates are for uploading Web sites. RDC is fine.
__________________
Registered User
dotNetFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2006   #7 (permalink)
Trusted User (495)
Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 486
LeaUK is on a distinguished road
Thanks DotNetFreak, that's the conclusion I came too also. Now off to locate some sellers and check pricing however that's appears a little more difficult than expected - rather strangely.

Would appreciate some advice on SPLA resellers...

Cheers
Lea
__________________
Registered User
LeaUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2006   #8 (permalink)
I am Staff at
Catalyst2 Services Ltd
About My Company!

Certified Host
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 378
catalyst2 is on a distinguished road
I think the only two in europe are Softcat and Software Spectrum (althight I could be wrong), we use software spectrum and havent had too many issues
__________________
Paul Redpath - catalyst2
UK Managed Hosting - 0800 107 7979
Company No: NI049920 VAT No: 835 3666 10
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
catalyst2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th December 2006   #9 (permalink)
Registered User (43)
Private Office...
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 36
Jeff - Exceed is on a distinguished road
As everyone has said, do not use the web edition. There are many limitations and you'll only find yourself needing to upgrade in due course.
__________________
Registered User
Jeff - Exceed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2006   #10 (permalink)
Trusted User (495)
Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 486
LeaUK is on a distinguished road
Cheers guys

Happy New Year
__________________
Registered User
LeaUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2007   #11 (permalink)
Trusted User (495)
Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 486
LeaUK is on a distinguished road
After reading the mammoth ToC for SPLA I discover the proof that unauthenticated (anonymous) is find as long as it's for web serving only. So in layman's terms - although Plesk creates and individually authenticates users, it's for web serving so it's OK. Here's a quote from MS 2007 Service Provider User Rights (SPUR) document for others in the future.


Quote:
For Windows Server 2003 R2 Anonymous, Standard, Enterprise and Datacenter Editions:
User Restrictions. You may allow only the following users to use or access the server software:


(i) Users who access your instances of the server software through the Internet without being authenticated or otherwise individually identified by the server software, or a multiplexing or pooling software or hardware,

(ii) Users who access and use the server software only as a platform for server applications (excluding applications that have direct or indirect interaction with Windows authentication services (when user or application credentials are exchanged between the server software and a user or device), such as Microsoft Exchange Server, Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services and Microsoft SharePoint Portal Server), and

(iii) Users who access your instances of the server software when those instances are used exclusively for web hosting. An instance is used for web hosting if:

a. The sole purpose of the server upon which the instance is running is to run websites that directly interface with the Internet and the primary functionality of the server is publicly accessible, AND
b. You permit and enable users of the websites to upload custom code, content, and data to their websites, without restriction. You may, however, restrict use for security reasons directly related to spam or other similar commercial email abuse as provided in your acceptable use policy. Your acceptable use policy must be reasonably based on web hosting industry standards.
Now the problem is that the web edition is only half the price of the full anonymous version.

Here are the limitations of the web edition that may effect me:

<=2GB RAM
No virtulization (maybe future only)
.NET2 is not supported (don't believe)
No Windows Media (not worried about streaming)
No Internet Connection Firewall - (ICF) is this true? If so if can't work with Plesk8.1 as this depends on ICF!?? Major issue.

Any thoughts? Appart from forget Web edition...

Cheers
Lea



Lea
__________________
Registered User
LeaUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2007   #12 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,296
Jon-NC is on a distinguished road
Forget web edition. Full stop. The above will limit plesk and the products you can offer. There is no upgrade from Web Edition to Standard.
__________________
Jon Rohan

Please note: My views are my own and not those of the company I work for.
__________________
Web Host - VIP Member
Jon-NC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2007   #13 (permalink)
Trusted User (495)
Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 486
LeaUK is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Forget web edition. Full stop.
I understand, but what in Plesk will it limit exactly, would you care to expand?

the 2GB limit is an issue...

.NET2 is not supported (can't believe that) if this is true I can't run SiteBuilder...that's an issue for me!


Quote:
There is no upgrade from Web Edition to Standard.
That's plain daft!
__________________
Registered User
LeaUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2007   #14 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,296
Jon-NC is on a distinguished road
.NET2 is used with plesk.

Web edition is a cheaper edition hence the limitations and lack of upgrade functionality. There's nothing really I can add. Unless you plan to run a pretty static website or a customised web app web edition is useless.
__________________
Jon Rohan

Please note: My views are my own and not those of the company I work for.
__________________
Web Host - VIP Member
Jon-NC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2007   #15 (permalink)
Trusted User (495)
Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 34
Posts: 486
LeaUK is on a distinguished road
Hi Jon

If web edition cannot run .NET2 that's it, all over and as you say that renders the platform useless. I wonder on earth why it doesn't support it..?

Cheers
Lea
__________________
Registered User
LeaUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[UK] Dell - Core2Duo 2.66GHz Server Edition only £99 - Christmas Deal GTX Web Hosting and Related Offers 7 25th January 2007 01:09 PM
UK High spec server - Pentium Extreme Edition 3.2Ghz Dual core HT, 2GB RAM, 250GB HDD Jonsen Web Hosting and Related Offers 0 11th October 2006 05:54 PM
(US edition) of YourNextHost richard Whats New & Announcements 0 19th February 2003 01:22 AM


Some great companies!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0