15th October 2007
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,297
|
Linux MTA's
Which Linux MTA do you prefer?
There seem to be three main players, sendmail, postfix and exim.
Are any of the above particularly better than one another? Or does it depend on use? All this choice is confusing.
__________________
Jon Rohan
Please note: My views are my own and not those of the company I work for.
__________________
Web Host - VIP Member
|
|
|
15th October 2007
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 218
|
No-one in their right mind would use a program whose config file is indistinguishable from line noise, so that rules sendmail out.
Personally I'm a huge fan of Exim. I've used it in deployments for very large ISPs, and really it's hard to fault it. It's incredibly stable, copes well under high load and basically does everything you need. The Exim mailing list is always helpful and has active developers regularly contributing, so it's pretty hard to beat in terms of support too.
I always found Postfix unnecessarily complex, with a multitude of different config files and poor documentation compared to Exim. I'm sure you'll find plenty of fans of it on here though, mainly because it's the default in most distros these days.
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
|
|
|
15th October 2007
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,297
|
I'm reading a book on Linux which is very biased to sendmail. In fact they only briefly discuss Postfix and Exim. I've used postfix a little in the past and thought it was ok to use.
I suppose a knowledge of all the above MTA's would be advisable. Just interested to know what people think of each.  .
__________________
Jon Rohan
Please note: My views are my own and not those of the company I work for.
__________________
Web Host - VIP Member
|
|
|
15th October 2007
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, United Kingdom
Age: 38
Posts: 4,293
|
Sendmail is fine - its rare you have to do much with eth main config file, and keeping the books handy fixes that - it just works, is efficient, and after a while sendmail/procmail/m4 all become 2nd nature
__________________
Web Host - VIP Member
|
|
|
15th October 2007
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 368
|
I'm a big Sendmail user... well, it's the MTA that all of the companies I've worked for use heavily.
Current job is an Exim house hold, but as long as you understnad MTA's and how they work it's just picking up what you know and translating it really!
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
|
|
|
15th October 2007
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Wales
Age: 34
Posts: 511
|
We moved to exim from sendmail a few years back so that we could use features that we needed at the time.
a) real time Mysql management
b) spam/virus rejections at smtp time
c) a more readable conf file
It's a long time since I've used sendmail for anything heavy so it may have improved but I doubt it.
Postfix has always seemed to be overly complex for what we needed.
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
Last edited by netserve : 16th October 2007 at 08:17 AM.
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 1,323
|
Do you mean you moved to exim from sendmail? I can't see anyone describing the sendmail config as 'more readable' over exim.
__________________
Phillip Baker
LCHost Chief Technical Officer
Hello, Companies Act 2006. Because looking information up at Companies House is very very difficult indeed (especially as they think the Internet closes at night), and this post could possibly be construed as a business communication, I am legally required to furnish you with the following information: Low Cost Host Ltd - Reg# 5172812, VAT# GB 842 9750 02 Correspondence address PO Box 11, Brighouse, W Yorks, HD6 1LQ Registered address c/o Allan P Naylor Accountant, 8 King Cross St, Halifax, W Yorks, HX1 2SH Inside leg measurement 31in (or 78.74cm) Favourite colour Blue Attitude towards ridiculous legislation Incredulous
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Wales
Age: 34
Posts: 511
|
Sorry Phil, well spotted, corrected now.
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,297
|
Exim seems to be a favourite in this case.
Cheers.
__________________
Jon Rohan
Please note: My views are my own and not those of the company I work for.
__________________
Web Host - VIP Member
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Wales
Age: 34
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon-NC
Exim seems to be a favourite in this case.
Cheers.
|
I'd agree, conf file is very readable and there are lots of cookbooks for very understandable setups.
Support for addons is good, greylisting, spam filtering, virus scanning, autoresponders, mailing lists etc.
Works with Mysql out of the box if you need realtime updates to your mail handling.
It seems efficient and scales well.
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newark, UK
Posts: 802
|
I'm a sendmail fan/user, I find the config fairly easy these days. I tried postfix for a few months on a couple of my MX servers and I didnt see any great reason to stick with it so they're all back to running sendmail now. I also love the amount of milters available for sendmail.
ChrisB.
__________________
Chris Burton
8086 Limited (Company No.: 06336617 VAT No.: 920 5102 75)
Ever wanted to know who uses a DNS or MX server ? with DNS History you can find out.
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Wales
Age: 34
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BurtyB
I'm a sendmail fan/user, I find the config fairly easy these days.
|
If you've gone through the leaning curve of working with sendmail.cf directly then it's understandable that you want to stick with it.
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Trusted User (397) Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 388
|
Debian ships with exim by default, so I use that on some machines, and postfix on others. I find postfix config clearer, but that's down to personal taste, I guess. It is more secure by design though, and as I'm fairly paranoid that suits me just fine.
There's a good comparison here: http://shearer.org/MTA_Comparison
__________________
Registered User
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nr Warrington, UK
Age: 31
Posts: 794
|
Has no-one any experience of qmail? Just seems to jump out as one that nobody has mentioned.
BTW, more of an exim man myself.
__________________
Web Host - Certified Member
|
|
|
16th October 2007
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Trusted User (397) Platinum User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 388
|
Quote:
|
qmail is unmaintained: the author has not released since 1997
|
That would be my guess 
__________________
Registered User
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|