22nd April 2008
|
#1 (permalink)
|
 Certified Host
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wales :(
Posts: 332
|
New switch
Right need some help, i'm sure you lot will be more helpful than the WHT people 
I need a different 48 port switch for a rack. Any recommendations? We are currently using an old Cisco 2948G which has about 30 of the ports being used and pushes around 130mb at maximum peak through its ge port.
Its got nothing special running on there other than SNMP (if you can call that special) so guess that is my only basic requirement other than that is its an managed switch. Reason for change? Found a nice Cacti script to monitor the switch's CPU and we found its hitting 1.0 solid at peak periods in the evening which looks (well to me anyway) as 100% CPU usage which can't be a good thing.
Any thoughts is appreciated 
-Chris
|
|
|
|
22nd April 2008
|
#2 (permalink)
|
 VIP Host
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,891
|
I don't think a 2948G doing only basic L2 switching is going to be at 100% CPU with only 30 ports at 130MB peak.
That 1.0 is probably more like 1%.
__________________
Mooharr
E-Mail Hosting Services
These are not my views and i cannot be held accountable for anything he says.
|
|
|
|
|
22nd April 2008
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Certified Host
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wales :(
Posts: 332
|
To be honest, we not sure but its too close to 1.0 everytime at the same day to be 1% in my mind but been wrong many times before. Graph attached, make of it as you will.
Last edited by ChrisOlver; 22nd April 2008 at 01:22 PM.
Reason: Would be a good idea to remove what rack the switch is in :p
|
|
|
|
|
22nd April 2008
|
#4 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 3,376
|
.... that looks regular enough to be backup traffic?
__________________
••• Mark Castle ••• Secura Hosting Ltd •••
••• Managed Hosting •••
••• AS29452 • UK Company Reg No: 04330657 • VAT Number: 789 2703 81 • Sales: 0845 123 2632 •••
My views are my own and not those of my company.
|
|
|
|
|
22nd April 2008
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Certified Host
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 971
|
I don't think actual port thoughput has anything to do with CPU utilisation on the 2948G as its done in hardware - its more likely to be something like MAC learning, STP changes or snmp\telnet\http activity or similar
|
|
|
|
|
22nd April 2008
|
#6 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by markcastle
.... that looks regular enough to be backup traffic?
|
People get home. Play games. Go to bed. Repeat.
__________________
Mooharr
E-Mail Hosting Services
These are not my views and i cannot be held accountable for anything he says.
|
|
|
|
|
22nd April 2008
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Certified Host
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wales :(
Posts: 332
|
People get home. Use Ventrilo/Teamspeak. Go to bed. Repeat.
|
|
|
|
|
22nd April 2008
|
#8 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 1,670
|
OK, this might sound really obvious but if it's happening at the same time each day then can you lot log in at that time and do "show proc cpu" and see what the CPU load is and if it's high, which process is killing it? Maybe I'm missing something here...
__________________
Freethought Internet Limited
Hosting and communications
Freethought Group Limited registered in London No. 5862996. Registered office: The Old Church Hall, 2A Cromwell Street, Lincoln, LN2 5LP.
Xion Internet and Freethought Internet are trading names of Freethought Group Limited.
|
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2008
|
#9 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London, United Kingdom
Age: 39
Posts: 4,856
|
the 1 will be 100%, and no, thats not good for your service...
you want to look at something like a 6504 to keep the density and pps or split it across multiple switches aggregated to a core switch capable of handling all the traffic
3*2960
connected to a 3750G
connected to your upstream
for example.
gaming is hard on switches if you want to keep to low/no packetloss etc, and if your graphing it you want to watch both the unicast and non-unicast traffic as well.
|
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2008
|
#10 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,471
|
Yup, it's the PPS rather than the absolute traffic, and gaming is a high PPS usage type compared to normal web traffic. I assume you've got Cacti graphing PPS?
|
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2008
|
#11 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,891
|
Still seems high to me. Have had 2950's do similar under gaming/voice and didn't see a problem.
__________________
Mooharr
E-Mail Hosting Services
These are not my views and i cannot be held accountable for anything he says.
|
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2008
|
#12 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,471
|
2950s are significantly newer than 2948G from memory though (someone correct me if I'm wrong, I'm no Cisco follower)
|
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2008
|
#13 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,501
|
What does "sh proc cpu" show at peak times? I can't believe you're hitting 100% CPU with layer 2 traffic.
|
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2008
|
#14 (permalink)
|
VIP Host
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 1,670
|
The 2948G (the layer 2 version) was a bit of a weird one, despite being part of the 29xx series of fixed switches, it ran CatOS like the higher end 4x00/5x00/6x00 modular series switches. It was EOLed several years ago whereas the 2950 was only EOLed recently to be replaced by the 2960.
Is yours the layer 2 (CatOS) or layer 3 (IOS) version? The straight 2948G is the CatOS/layer 2 version IIRC whereas the 2948G-L3 is the IOS/layer 3 version.
I'd take a look at what's hogging CPU time on that 2948G as I've got one (and the related 2980G) and there is no way that should be maxing out under normal use.
__________________
Freethought Internet Limited
Hosting and communications
Freethought Group Limited registered in London No. 5862996. Registered office: The Old Church Hall, 2A Cromwell Street, Lincoln, LN2 5LP.
Xion Internet and Freethought Internet are trading names of Freethought Group Limited.
|
|
|
|
|
23rd April 2008
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Certified Host
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wales :(
Posts: 332
|
Layer 2, CatOS version.
All we are using atm the is the memory usage, cpu and general bandwidth. Due to the fact its CatOS all I could monitor with the scripts available was the memory, CPU and network usage.
While we do have some 2950 in other racks doing fine, please do remember that this is 130mb/s of pure gaming and ventrilo/teamspeak traffic with the majority being voice servers. I tried to do show proc cpu last night but had an issue else where to attend too.
-Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
| Networking, Routing and Transit Routers, Switches, Layer 2, Layer 3, BGP or Wireless - Chat about it here |
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
|
