+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Network Hardware

  1. #1
    Certified Standard Host
    I have made 463 posts
    87 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    ChrisOlver is on a distinguished road

    Network Hardware

    Hi Guys,

    Anyone got any recommendations for a hardware load balancer or can point me in the correct direction at what to look at? I've got a client here who is using Windows load balancer/software based load balancer but is finding that its just not keeping up.

    Ta for your help.

  2. #2
    Certified VIP Host
    I have made 3350 posts
    1242 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    Ed-Freethought is on a distinguished road
    Personal favourites are the Foundry ServerIron range or the Cisco ACE modules for the 6500 chassis
    Both can have hardware SSL offload and if you really want can do global server load balancing accross multiple data centres.
    The ServerIrons scale right the way from small 1U boxes through to chassis. Cisco have appliance versions of the ACE if I remember correctly but the real advantage of the ACE service modules is that you can put them in the same 6500 chassis you're using for switching/routing if you have a high end set up. They also support virtulization so you can host multiple seperate clients on them if you want to provide them as a service. I can't remember to what extend the Foundrys do off the top of my head.
    Freethought Internet Limited
    Hosting and communications
    Freethought Internet Limited registered in London No. 5862996. Registered office: The Old Church Hall, 2A Cromwell Street, Lincoln, LN2 5LP.
    Xion Internet and Powercore Networks are trading names of Freethought Internet Limited.

  3. #3
    Mooharr
    no reviews yet. Post Review
    Certified VIP Host
    I have made 2376 posts
    277 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    JamesSykes is on a distinguished road
    HAProxy

    Extremely high performance. I don't think there is anything out there that comes close.

    Recently used it for a big televised event sitting in front of 16 app servers. It's a piece of piss to setup and doesn't need alot of hardware. I stuck it on DL360 with a 2.4Ghz Xeon. Didn't go above 20% utilisation and it was handling 100k pageviews a minute. (something like 500k hits/minute)

    Using something like heartbeat and keepalive you can have a full HA/DR load balancer setup for peanuts that outperforms high end kit.
    Mooharr
    E-Mail Hosting Services

    These are not my views and i cannot be held accountable for anything he says.

  4. #4
    Certified VIP Host
    I have made 3937 posts
    313 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    markcastle is on a distinguished road
    Zeus ZXTM
    ••• Mark Castle ••• Secura Hosting Ltd •••
    ••• Managed Hosting •••
    ••• AS29452UK Company Reg No: 04330657VAT Number: 789 2703 81Sales: 0845 123 2632 •••
    My views are my own and not those of my company.

  5. #5
    Chris,

    I think that unless you have some serious budget then you will be looking at an open source solution - I would expect most budget 'hardware' solutions are embedded/PC + Linux underneath + well known open source packages.

    All the real solutions are custom designed hardware and you would have to expect some serious budget.

    We've just been demo'ed a great load balancer and accelerator product that is custom hardware, 7 independent CPUs - very clever piece of kit indeed, I'm not expecting it to be very budget.
    Paul Civati
    Rack Sense Ltd
    Views expressed are my own and not those of the company.
    Company reg no. 05115163, VAT reg no. GB 912 5238 45

  6. #6
    Network EQ Ltd.
    no reviews yet. Post Review
    Certified Standard Host
    I have made 82 posts
    30 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    gavint is on a distinguished road
    Depends what you're looking for - F5 just bought out some nice new low-end BIG-IP boxes and are the market leader, but you pay for it...

    Citrix Netscaler is supposed to be a good alternative with a slightly lower cost, although I've not used it personally.

    BIG-IP can eat Cisco ACE blades for breakfast. Easy to configure, amazing throughput and good layer 7 features.

    The trouble with hardware load balancers is that as it's pointless replacing one single point of failure with another, you always have to have two of them.

    Gavin

  7. #7
    Bashton Ltd
    no reviews yet. Post Review
    Certified Standard Host
    I have made 366 posts
    49 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    samb is on a distinguished road
    Citrix Netscaler if you have a very large site and/or need SSL offload, Linux HAProxy solution otherwise.

    We resell both..

  8. #8
    Certified Standard Host
    I have made 463 posts
    87 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    ChrisOlver is on a distinguished road
    Hi Paul,

    This isn't for a budget solution so if you can highly recommend a model (and give me a rough example of costing) then ill happily submit it to the guys.

    Ill take a gander at HAProxy.

  9. #9
    One thing I don't get is lots of people seem to have one load balancer and N web servers, I know one load balancer can handle a hell of a lot more load than one web server, but surely from a redundancy point of view, having just one is a bit silly?
    James Creese - UK Webhosting Ltd. - 0800 024 2931
    http://www.tsohost.co.uk - affordable UK based shared web hosting since 2003
    Company reg: 04977925 VAT reg: GB 833 9677 84

  10. #10
    Certified VIP Host
    I have made 3937 posts
    313 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    markcastle is on a distinguished road
    sometimes thats the only fit where
    a) The budget doesn't stretch to a more resilient solution and/or
    b) more complexity required by a fully redundant solution isn't desired.

    I guess there is no getting around the fact that clients drive budgets, regardless of whether or not it's actually the best thing for the job or not.
    ••• Mark Castle ••• Secura Hosting Ltd •••
    ••• Managed Hosting •••
    ••• AS29452UK Company Reg No: 04330657VAT Number: 789 2703 81Sales: 0845 123 2632 •••
    My views are my own and not those of my company.

  11. #11
    Mooharr
    no reviews yet. Post Review
    Certified VIP Host
    I have made 2376 posts
    277 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    JamesSykes is on a distinguished road
    Quote Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
    One thing I don't get is lots of people seem to have one load balancer and N web servers, I know one load balancer can handle a hell of a lot more load than one web server, but surely from a redundancy point of view, having just one is a bit silly?
    Probably the same sort of people that have a single DB server behind those N app servers. Just depends whether you have the cash to be fully redundant because there isn't much point having two load balancers if you only have a single switch etc...
    Mooharr
    E-Mail Hosting Services

    These are not my views and i cannot be held accountable for anything he says.

  12. #12
    One of the main questions is : are you doing SSL offloading or is it just plain HTTP ? We have seen situations where SSL-offloading kill some devices within minutes, while others can stand a fair amount of traffic.

    Next you should ask how your network is setup. What is the speed of the webservers and the maximum throughput you want to achieve ?

  13. #13
    Network EQ Ltd.
    no reviews yet. Post Review
    Certified Standard Host
    I have made 82 posts
    30 posts within 6 months
    Contact Me, Company profile
    gavint is on a distinguished road
    If you're doing SSL offload you need to look for something that has an SSL accelerator - F5 use Cavium chips for this in most models.

    Gavin

  14. #14
    Foundry also has some very interesting products. Their starter product is the ServerIron 4G-SSL.This unit has 4 x 1g combo-ports (copper and fibre) and can handle a bulk throughput of 500 Mbps, with around 1500 connections per second and 5000 transactions per second (only SSL-handshakes). In comparison, you could take a look at a cisco 11501. We experienced result where a throughput of around 70 mbit per second (around 200 sessions) takes the CPU to around 45 %.

  15. #15
    I'll second the F5 vote, expensive but top notch boxes. Check the hardware specs PDF on their website and spec accordingly.

    If you are thinking about SSL offload on to the F5s then you'll need an additional license and these are priced according to the TPS (transactions per second) you want it to be able to process.

    Used them for over a year now and not had any hicups.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Various Hardware
    By Jon-RackSRV in forum General Classifieds
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 16th January 2007, 04:06 PM
  2. KVM over IP ..... what hardware?
    By UH-Matt in forum Business and Technical Advice
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th June 2006, 12:12 AM
  3. Selling network hardware
    By Real-Hosts in forum Business and Technical Advice
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 3rd February 2006, 03:53 AM
  4. hardware for sale
    By Scott in forum Dedicated Servers, VPS and Colocation
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 3rd March 2004, 09:08 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC2