Can someone review?

zervex · 12th November 2005

Can someone do a review on our product DSM. At www.zervex.com. I'd really like to know what people think, what features are missing/need work. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks guys! -Jon

Dexxa · 12th November 2005

http://www.zervex.com/

Nice looking site, Small and simple to understand, Price is nice and cheap,

Plus do you have plans to open a windows control panel?

seveninternet · 12th November 2005

Hi Jon

Could you tell me if your control panel support Redhat 7.3 with Apache 1.3.x

Most of our servers use the Plesk control panel. But we have found that plesk won't support Apache 1.3.x after the next update & we are also having problems with Qmail.

Could you email me some extra info on the software that you support?

Cheers

Cranky · 13th November 2005

What problems are you having with Qmail? Any reasons you can't use Apache 2.x in future?

seveninternet · 13th November 2005

The problem I've got is that Apache 2 requires cgi module called suexec that causes problems with sharing CGI scripts on shared ssl/un-ssl space (this is due to premissions).

At the moment the scripts live in the ssl file but the unsecure url need to access the secure folder aswell.

http://www.domainname.co.uk/cgi-bin/store/shop.cgi

https://www.securespace.co.uk/cgi-bin/store/shop.cgi

I hope this makes sense?

Qmail

I have clients that use mailgate software to collect email from our server. Qmail puts a number in the TO line of the header which causes problems for mailgate to sort mail out. As a qiuck fix we have moved them to our old unix server that has postfix & sendmail on (plesk only seem to support qmail). But this can't be a long term fix as its an old server.

Cranky · 13th November 2005

It's been a while since I used apache1 with Plesk, but it also used a customised version of suexec (psa-suexec), doesn't this cause the same problems?

Qmail doesn't change the TO header of email, it uses a Delivered-To field beginning with a number. If mailgate was to use the TO header to determine the correct mailname it would work fine. We use various (around 6 different packages) ticket systems with qmail without problem, and have managed multiple mail gateways (although admittedly these were designed for qmail). Personally I would contact mailgate developers and ask them to consider implementing some sort of patch.

zervex · 13th November 2005

We do support Redhat 7.3 and apache 1.x. We don't have any immediate plans for a windows version. We use courier for mail, and haven't found any good reason to move the system to apache 2. -jon

stelios · 14th November 2005

Quote:

I'd really like to know what people think, what features are missing/need work. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks guys!

1. Debian support
2. A page with detailed description about its features
3. Cluster features (email, database, dns)
4. Disaster recovery plan (including server configs etc)
5. Support somehow for Resin insteed of Tomcat (Tomcat is crap comparing to Resin)
6. You need to update accordinly your admin interface with human-computer interaction in mind.

niyogi · 29th November 2005

Very nice website - just integrate the forum in a little more and it'll do nicely. Great pricing and a fantastic looking product too.

But...where's the features section. I just see a hashed out hyperlink. Does your product do imports from cpanel?

Cheers,
Roj

fuzzlepop · 29th November 2005

I instantly thought template, Not sure if it is or not but gives me instant impression your site hasn't had much work done on it.

Nice though

[inx]Olly · 29th November 2005

THIS USER HAS BEEN GAGGED BY THE FORUM HOSTS FOR SPAM OR BREAKING THE RULES...
User will be ungaged in around 78 hours from this post.

andyb28 · 29th November 2005

THIS USER HAS BEEN GAGGED BY THE FORUM HOSTS FOR SPAM OR BREAKING THE RULES...
User will be ungaged in around 78 hours from this post.