Thread: New UK2.net site - u like?

Hi guys,
UK2.net v 2.0 is now online. You like it?

www.uk2.net

this is what we came from initially www.uk2.net/indexold.htm

best,

Ditlev

Much nicer
Although, you have 17 validation errors - I'd try to get these fixed.

yeah - its still a bit rough around the ages

I think I like the old one better. :P.


Looking good. Much much nicer.

site has had an improvement, but you cant allways judge a ompany by its website

Originally Posted by ukgaz

site has had an improvement, but you cant allways judge a ompany by its website

not sure what that was about, but I am glad you like the new site

It looks cleaner and more "sane" IMO

ChrisB.

THIS USER HAS BEEN GAGGED BY THE FORUM HOSTS FOR SPAM OR BREAKING THE RULES...
User will be ungaged in around 78 hours from this post.

Clean and less cluttered is always the way.

Research shows that the less cluttered the page, the more 'quick' sales conversions. By offering the quick buy option, you are grabbing yourself a large % of the buying market- the impulse buyer.

Other than that nice design. Very well done.

THIS USER HAS BEEN GAGGED BY THE FORUM HOSTS FOR SPAM OR BREAKING THE RULES...
User will be ungaged in around 91 hours from this post.

Its a nice site - However, I'd get all those images with keywords such as "domains" and "web hosting" etc .. to be text.

You'll see the new UH site come live very soon, putting the final touches to it now infact. Theres only going to be one section of "image text" ... the logo

Originally Posted by James[UH]

Its a nice site - However, I'd get all those images with keywords such as "domains" and "web hosting" etc .. to be text.

You'll see the new UH site come live very soon, putting the final touches to it now infact. Theres only going to be one section of "image text" ... the logo

Not necessarily - just use CSS Image Replacement to do it so search engines see text rather than images. Obviously, if the images are just text which would look the same with or without the image then it makes more sense to have text to improve page load times.

Originally Posted by aTech

Not necessarily - just use CSS Image Replacement to do it so search engines see text rather than images. Obviously, if the images are just text which would look the same with or without the image then it makes more sense to have text to improve page load times.

This is what we have attempted to do - and put it as H1's.

Thanks for your comments

d.

You might want to do, as James suggested, make your Domains/Hosting/Servers subheadings

with image replacement.

Hi,

I like the design, but you're home page shows domains @ £1.99 /month which is a big price increase from your old site.

*** Takes Pedantic hat off now ***

Originally Posted by aTech

Much nicer
Although, you have 17 validation errors - I'd try to get these fixed.

Should be fixed now